Vermont Public is independent, community-supported media, serving Vermont with trusted, relevant and essential information. We share stories that bring people together, from every corner of our region. New to Vermont Public? Start here.

© 2024 Vermont Public | 365 Troy Ave. Colchester, VT 05446

Public Files:
WVTI · WOXM · WVBA · WVNK · WVTQ · WVTX
WVPR · WRVT · WOXR · WNCH · WVPA
WVPS · WVXR · WETK · WVTB · WVER
WVER-FM · WVLR-FM · WBTN-FM

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact hello@vermontpublic.org or call 802-655-9451.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Explore our coverage of government and politics.

DNC Committee Pitches Changes That Would Limit Superdelegate Number, Power

Alex Brandon
/
AP
On one side of Philadelphia this weekend, final preparations for the Democratic National Conventions were underway. Across town, a key committee took action to limit the number and power of superdelegates in future elections.

The 2016 Democratic presidential primary was in some ways as much as referendum on the nominating process as it was on the candidates themselves. A key committee at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia has now moved to curb the influence of so-called superdelegates on the primary process, and several Vermonters helped lead the push for the changes.

About 170 people spent more than 10 hours in a windowless conference room in downtown Philadelphia on Saturday. Sixty-nine of them had been chosen by Bernie Sanders to represent his campaign on what’s known as the Democratic Party’s Standing Committee on Rules.

“There were people in the hallway chanting, loudly, to end superdelegates altogether,” says Anthony Iarrapino, a Montpelier lawyer, and one of Sanders’ picks for the rules committee. “They just didn’t understand why you would have this class of delegate and give them this outsized responsibility or authority in the process.”

Follow our team on the ground in Philadelphia: Twitter | Instagram | Snapchat

The role of superdelegates in the 2016 election became a flashpoint even before the first primary votes were cast. Superdelegates consist in part of elected officials, fundraisers and party bigwigs who get to vote for whichever candidate they choose, no matter the popular vote in the state they represent.

Sanders and his supporters say the system gives undue influence to insider elites. And on Saturday, they clashed for hours with Clinton’s picks to the rules committee over the future of superdelegates in the nominating process.

"What we Bernie people were trying to help them understand is the American people are skeptical of the Democratic Party and of establishment politics altogether. And if you don't do something to tell them you've heard that skepticism ... that's going to help Trump." — Anthony Iarrapino, a Sanders delegate to the rules committee

“People’s tempers were getting short on both sides, because it was just so frustrating that there was seemingly no genuine dialog, just people talking past them,” Iarrapino says.

The Sanders camp wasn’t able to convince their counterparts in the Clinton camp to do away with superdelegates entirely. But the committee approved a compromise, wherein a so-called "Unity Commission" will draft a plan to drastically reduce the number of superdelegates in time for the 2020 elections.

“It’s a much smaller group. It’s a change down from 700-plus, to 200-plus,” Iarrapino says. Iarrapino says Clinton’s representatives on the rules committee rejected several resolutions that would have done away with superdelegates altogether.

“What we Bernie people were trying to help them understand is the American people are skeptical of the Democratic Party and of establishment politics altogether,” Iarrapino says. “And if you don’t do something to tell them you’ve heard that skepticism, that you’re going to reform and make your party more inclusive and more transparent, that’s going to help Trump.”

Credit Emily Alfin Johnson / VPR
/
VPR
Iarrapino says the compromise reached will reduce the amount of superdelegates drastically by 2020.

The specifics of the new electoral regime, however, now rest in the hands of a yet-to-be named, 21-person commission that won’t produce a proposal for 18 months.

“You know, it’s not a done deal. This commission is going to need to be watched. People have to participate,” Iarrapino says.

Terje Anderson is one of the people who will be doing the watching. Anderson is a Montgomery resident and longtime political activist who in May was elected to serve as one of Vermont’s four representatives on the Democratic National Committee. That’s the group that will appoint the commission, and the one that will approve or deny its proposal.

"There's a real sense that these issues have been floating out there long enough. They've been the subject of debate and controversy, that I think the party knows they need to at least address them and deal with them." — Terje Anderson, a Vermonter on the Democratic National Committee

“So my hope is that they have the time and the resources to get meaningful input from across the party, to listen to experts about what they say about some of those questions,” Anderson says.

Anderson says past commissions created by the DNC have yielded little in the way of meaningful reform. Anderson says he’s optimistic this time will be different.

“There’s a real sense that these issues have been floating out there long enough. They’ve been the subject of debate and controversy, that I think the party knows they need to at least address them and deal with them,” Anderson says.

The resolution to create the Unity Commission goes up for a final vote before the full Democratic convention on Monday.

Funding for VPR's coverage of the presidential campaign is made possible in part by the VPR Journalism Fund.

The Vermont Statehouse is often called the people’s house. I am your eyes and ears there. I keep a close eye on how legislation could affect your life; I also regularly speak to the people who write that legislation.
Latest Stories