Vermont Public is independent, community-supported media, serving Vermont with trusted, relevant and essential information. We share stories that bring people together, from every corner of our region. New to Vermont Public? Start here.

© 2024 Vermont Public | 365 Troy Ave. Colchester, VT 05446

Public Files:
WVTI · WOXM · WVBA · WVNK · WVTQ · WVTX
WVPR · WRVT · WOXR · WNCH · WVPA
WVPS · WVXR · WETK · WVTB · WVER
WVER-FM · WVLR-FM · WBTN-FM

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact hello@vermontpublic.org or call 802-655-9451.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Explore our coverage of government and politics.

Leahy: Iran Nuclear Deal Will Help Avert War In Mideast

J. Scott Applewhite
/
AP file
Senator Leahy has worked to sway Senate Democrats to support Obama's Iran nuclear agreement, which he believes will reduce the possibility of war. (File photo)

Sen. Patrick Leahy says the likelihood that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon in the next decade has been greatly reduced because enough Senate Democrats are supporting President Obama's nuclear agreement with Iran.

Leahy says Congressional rejection of the deal would have almost certainly led to war in the Middle East.

To Senator Leahy this is a pretty clear-cut issue: support a deal that has the framework of a plan to monitor Iran's nuclear program in the future or reject it and risk that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon in the next few years.

"If we backed out of this deal all the countries that joined us with the sanctions and all will leave. So there would be almost no sanctions on Iran and Iran will have no reason not to build a nuclear weapon," Leahy said.

When the agreement comes before Congress later this month, it will be presented as negative vote.

This means members of Congress will be voting "yes" if they disapprove of the agreement and "no" if they support it.

It's likely that both the House and Senatewill both vote to reject the deal. If this happens the president will veto the legislation. There are now at least 36 Senate Democrats who are prepared to sustain the veto — that's two more than the minimum number needed.

Leahy says he's convinced that a total Congressional rejection of the agreement would have led to additional military actions in the Middle East.

"The same people who want us to reject this are the same people who argued how important is was to get into the war in Iraq. It cost us three trillion dollars, thousands upon thousands of lives and the area is less stable than it was before," Leahy said.

"The same people who want us to reject this (Iran deal) are the same people who argued how important is was to get into the war in Iraq. It cost us $3 trillion, thousands upon thousands of lives and the area is less stable than it was before." Sen. Patrick Leahy

And Leahy says the full implementation of the deal will give the United States an opportunity to have more influence in the Middle East.

"We ought to be spending time to open up to Iran and see if we can bring about changes in one of the oldest civilizations in that part of the world," he said.

Leahy says the international inspection provisions of the agreement are strong enough to verify that Iran is complying with the terms of the deal.

Bob Kinzel has been covering the Vermont Statehouse since 1981 — longer than any continuously serving member of the Legislature. With his wealth of institutional knowledge, he answers your questions on our series, "Ask Bob."
Latest Stories