It appears a troubled broadband service provider is still operating in Vermont, but officials say there’s a great deal of confusion over who’s operating it.
There are as many as two thousand Vermont subscribers to GAW High Speed Internet, also known as Great Auk Wireless.
Most are in the Northeast Kingdom and the Brattleboro area.
Vermont Director of Telecommunications Jim Porter says in recent weeks he’s been hearing from them about system outages and lost email service.
“Clearly something’s going on with this company that thus far has not been good for consumers,” he said.
Porter said the department isn’t telling customers to find another provider, but it is giving them a list of alternate service providers.
He said most of the information the department has been able to collect is anecdotal because it’s been difficult to find someone with the company who can answer authoritatively.
“We have been in touch with several people who we believe have an ownership interest, but we’re not entirely sure who does own the company right now,” said Porter.
The company, which says it has more than 30,000 subscribers in New England, was founded in 2005 by two former students from Leland and Gray Union High School in Townshend.
One of them, Josh Garza, is listed as CEO at the company’s website. But it’s unclear whether he’s still involved.
VTDigger has reported that Garza is under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission in relation to a digital currency company he started.
Finding the company’s owners is of particular interest to the Vermont Attorney General’s office.
The state is trying to recover $18,018 in grant money given to GAW two years ago by the Vermont Telecommunications Authority to extend service to a handful of customers in Rutland County.
The money is part of a $64,000 grant, though the remainder of the funds were never awarded.
“This office has had some difficulty finding an individual who would be authorized and willing to address the state’s demand,” said Assistant Attorney General Jacob Humbert.
Humbert said a Connecticut address given on the company’s website appears to be outdated and telephone calls have gone unanswered.
He said it appears the people who answer customer support inquiries work for an independent contractor and not for GAW.
“It’s not clear to the state that there are actually any current employees on staff,” Humbert said.
The state’s experience creates the image of a company running on autopilot.
GAW did not respond to VPR's inquiries, but one GAW subscriber told VPR his service in West Glover has been good and the company, at least in the past, has been responsive.
It’s a different story for the town of Brighton, where the water department hasn’t been able to access emails because it has service through GAW.
Town Administrator Joel Cope says GAW rents space for a broadband antenna on the roof of the town office building for $60 per month.
He says the company is more than $1,400 dollars behind in its payments but the town is reluctant to take the antenna down.
“The antenna on the roof serves some of our citizens with their high speed internet so we have not been inclined to do that so far. We’re sitting it out and hoping that something works out,” Cope says.
GAW is also Cope’s home service provider and he says had service and email problems and hasn’t gotten much help from the company’s customer support staff.
Cope’s temporary solution to his problem is to resort to an old dial up system for email.